Desk audit TBR-A-2026-019

Pocket Option

Independent desk audit of a retail broker, from public sources.

Last updated First published

Current. Valid to 9 October 2027.

TBR DESK AUDIT · PUBLIC SOURCES · C 11/100

Serious concerns

Desk audit. TBR carried out this audit on its own initiative, using public sources only. No firm paid for it. No accounts were opened or tested, so Execution & Pricing and Operational Resilience were not assessed and do not count towards the grade. Pocket Option may respond, and any response is published in full. How desk audits are scored. See Verified audits, which our trading experts test hands-on.

Summary

No company behind Pocket Option holds a licence from any financial regulator, its terms do not name the company clients contract with, and it discloses no owner. Brazil’s CVM fined its operator R$3.9 million in August 2026 for systematic and repeated unauthorised offers after two stop orders, and regulators in more than fifteen countries have warned against it.

Grade
C
Score
11/100
Fieldwork
8 Oct 2026 to 9 Oct 2026
Findings
5 high3 medium

Scorecard

PillarWeightScoreGrade
Regulation & Licensing19%5C
Corporate Structure & Ownership14%20C
Client Money & Payouts19%10C
Execution & Pricingn/aNot assessed: requires live testing
Conduct & Disclosure14%15C
Operational Resiliencen/aNot assessed: requires live testing
People & Community5%0C
Overall71%11C

The overall score is the weighted average of the assessed pillars, with their weights scaled back up to 100.

This grade summarises the evidence we reviewed up to 9 October 2026. It is not a guarantee of the firm's safety or future conduct, and changes after that date are not reflected. Nothing here is financial or legal advice.

Findings

Licences verified

Each licence was checked directly against the regulator's public register on the date shown.

EntityRegulatorLicenceCheckedResult

Notes and sources

Evidence and scope

Scope

Desk audit of the brand’s client-facing entities, using public sources only: regulator registers, warnings and sanction records, and the firm’s own published documents, as available on 9 October 2026. No accounts were opened, nothing was tested live, and the firm was not asked for evidence. No licence was found to verify against a register.

Limitations

Absence of a public enforcement record is not evidence of good conduct. The company registries of Saint Lucia and Costa Rica could not be searched, so the companies named could not be verified. Whether the CVM fine has been appealed or paid is not known. The Bank of Russia’s warning list could not be searched.

Evidence reviewed

  • CVM judgment, PAS 19957.013932/2025-16, 25 August 2026 (report and vote)
  • CONSOB resolutions of 2020, 2021, 2025 and 2026
  • FCA, AMF, CNMV, CFTC, ASIC, BCSC, FSMA, AFM and other regulator warnings
  • Pocket Option public offer agreement, payment policy and website disclosures

Version history

  1. Report published.

Request a re-audit

Staff of Pocket Option can ask us to reopen this audit, for example after correcting a finding or completing remediation. Requests must come from a company email address, and you can attach evidence.

Request a re-audit